This is sad.
Submitted by mvanhouten on November 28 2000 18:43:43
In reply to Re: Alright.... submitted by asb on November 28 2000 17:45:06
|
"Children are not small adults. They must develop physically, emotionally and mentally," And before the civil war, people (like you) were saying that "colored folks" could never handle "real life." They needed the gentle guidance of their masters (whip). And of course, in the early 20th century, ladies needed the gentle guidance of their husbands, they couldn't handle real life. And native Americans needed the gentle guidance of the European christians. And NOW you are telling us that all minors (everyone under what? 14,16,18,21?) need YOUR gentle guidance, too. And in all these cases, the evidence that these humans were incapable was based largely on the cruel foundation of those in control never allowing them the education and RESPECT that would allow them to show their talents. It's an oppression justified by circular logic, and cruel self-interest. At this site YOU are advocating the FORCED abstinance of fellow human beings. Not me, but of all minors. That is patronizing, abusive, and sick. Sick because you feel some right to CONTROL the sexual expression of others. Minors are not your pets breed or enjoy life only when you want to let loose of the choke-chain. I have to ask you to explain why this site is called the Christian Boy Love Forum. "Boy love" is a term popularized by NAMBLA in the 80s. NAMBLA-- from its beginnings-- has advocated for the equal rights of minors. By using the term "boylove" you imply that this site welcomes those who advocate for equal rights for minors. If you don't feel that way, maybe it is best that you remain celibate. If the controllers of this site believe it is wrong to promote youth rights, maybe a better title would be "Christian Pedophile Forum." I understand the word is now available. |
Follow ups: