I think...
Submitted by Triple Q on December 12 2000 00:12:34
In reply to Re: Just one point submitted by Heather on December 12 2000 00:02:56
|
So I would say that there's no logical connection between being a boylover with a limited AOA and being certain that you will no longer love a boy after he reaches the limit of your AOA. Boylovers who believe that are limited, not by their AOAs, but by their unwillingness to make an emotional commitment to the boys they claim to love. That was my point. :) They seem to be saying that they are drawing a clear delineation of where their love will end, so they never allow themselves to fall totally in love in order to spare themselves the hurt of separation. Same difference. "unwillingness to make an emotion commitment" or "never allow themselves to fall totally in love" Whether it be for unwillingness or "premeditated" unwillingness by setting limits. :) Btw, I'm trying to be careful not to be "all-inclusive" (ie, all boylovers) but sometimes fail. Bear with me. |
Follow ups: