Revising sex
Submitted by David on January 12 2001 16:54:47
In reply to Christian boylove to me means... (brief) submitted by Splash! on January 12 2001 03:34:31
|
Splash: I am not advocating sex, but I am not condemning it, I am simply saying that SEX is not a relevant option of the boylover for the present time, but the core of the boylove movement is NOT to get a little boys pants off, but is to liberate love in all it's forms. That may sound like pretense to sexuality, but it not meant to be so. I see Nambla as the Adam of Boylove, in modern America: for I know Europe and Asia and Meso-Amercia have their own Boylove movements: but for us Nambla is the seminal thinker-to put into Hegelian terms- and the offspring is, among many things, also religious searching within boylove. I do not see sex with boys as sinful: but for now it would be because ones own commonsense says not to because it is social created to be immoral. Jesus says that "My son, your sins are forgiven," and so by sin being forgiven means we must open up to liberating oursleevs. Our boylove is a wall between ourself and God, and so we must break through that wall to total freedom in that area of Self, and thus we must free ourself from that sin by liberating boylove. Boylove within the sexual attraction aspect is certainly not selfish, but an appeal God offers to our more instinctive nature, and we turn that instint into a prayer of freedom by that nature being inclined to the young male. Just some thoughts God Speed David |
Follow ups: