He's a doofus. Read his papers carefully and you'll notice that his assumptions of harm are rarely supported by the evidence. He ASSUMES that sexual experiences must be negative and then uses statistics to try to demonstrate how negative. His efforts at demonstrating causality are quite lame. Yes, he's a well-known researcher. In fact, he's becoming more well known as his work comes under increasing attack by more objective scientists. Even researchers in the "anti BL" camp are questioning his results these days. Jim |