...but you're already taken. At a quick read-over, the text seems decent. I think the name of the endeavour is going to prove troublesome, however. It'll be like the proverbial waving of the red herring in the bull's face for evangelicals. "Inclusive" is a Dirty Word to evangelical Christians, since it immediately invokes images of "inclusive salvation", meaning everybody gets to go to heaven regardless of what they think about Jesus. Not that I can think of what phrasing might express the idea you're trying to communicate better. But I fear as it is the name itself will undermine the goal of getting Christians to think about the way they're caring about each other. Fod |