*sigh* This is so hopeless...
Submitted by Daze on 2003-02-16 17:12:10, Sunday
In reply to Re: Why won't you get it through your thick head? submitted by Ron on 2003-02-16 14:36:00, Sunday
|
Ah, man! You remind me of my teacher Dutch, and that's quite a retard, to put him in a category with people who are Einstein's compared to him. --- "I hope you're all through having your temper tantrum, Dazed. All that stomping, screaming and whining is bad for your blood pressure." Let's see. Who was the one coming in here starting to stomp, scream, and whine about pedophiles being molesters? Oh yeah! That was YOU wasn't it? I'll ignore this one. --- "I realize that pedophiles are emotionally immature and so I'll overlook all your name-calling and sub-literate ranting and screeching denial. You're sick and can't help yourself." ...said the one trying to put the ones down who showed more maturity and healthy behaviour then himself. Besides, if pedo's are sick, homosexuals are sick too. But I don't see any of em being called sicko's, and I know a few. --- "I had a hard time deciphering some of your more illiterate ravings and what seemed to be attempts to quote me and those things I've said which have you stuck to the ceiling waiting to be peeled off." Interesting you are using spelling as an argument. So far, I haven't seen any really bad spelling mistakes. Oh wait. Do you mean the "ogm lolz ownened"? That is to show you that you talk pure nonsense, like a chatfag. --- "Now if you can focus let me repeat some of the hard facts and realities I've been citing: BOYLOVERS are homosexual pedophiles who seek to legitimize pedophilia, or to use their term "man-boy love" and change the laws and social policy which govern the protection of children from sexual abuse." BUUUZZZZ!!! I'm sorry sir, you are not going through for the fridge. We want those laws to be there. Sexual abuse of children is NOT on our to do list. Wait... wait... There could be a big misunderstanding here. In my book, "do not" means to keep yourself or others from doing something. I don't know about you, but where I come from, earth, "NOT" means: "THAT'S A NEGATIVE". --- "What "Boylovers" all have in common is a sexual attraction to young boys. Besides this being a self-evident fact, "Boylovers" are in support groups such as this because they share the desire to have intimate relationships with minors and society is uncompromising in its views on sexual relations between adults and children, and so we have laws and penal codes such as "statutory rape" in all 50 states to discourage and punish that very thing." People give different meanings to the words "intimate relationship", so I read on, hoping you would give the same meaning to it as I did. Appearantly, no. You said exactly the same as above, just in other words, so guess what? I will do that too. "We love the laws!" --- "If you love and care for children and seek to help them grow into decent, responsible, secure and confident adults while protecting them from harm or from being misguided and sometimes protecting them even from themselves there's nothing at all wrong with that and should be more this kind of community or family feeling we used to have in this society, but which has been fading with social trends and mobility for at least the past 50 years." So you shouldn't attack us. --- "But, "Boylovers" want the legal right to have "consentual" sexual relationships with underaged boys and are pushing this agenda night and day." Look at this line, and read it over and over again, until you wake up at night, bathing in your own sweat, from a nightmare about your dog who ate a little bird: Boylover is not predator. --- "The fact that you must face is that you are a grown man who has a strong emotional attachment to young boys, which not only includes a sexual attraction, but is the defining factor in so-called "Boylove" identity. You would not be in a support group like this if your love for children were strictly platonic and did not have an aspect which is taboo in our society." Appearantly you still don't get it. Read for a change: You have 3 kinds of people: The "normal" people, the boylovers, and the predators. Since most people still seem to confuse the boylovers with the predators, many boylover groups (What? You think CBL was the only one?) were founded. --- "I know that you don't regard your feelings for boys as "lust" and that you feel that you have some special love and caring for boys. You wish that these feelings could be expressed in a more intimate way and that these be accepted by a society you probably regard as still too old-fashioned, too narrow minded and restrictive, even with all the permissiveness, social trends, acceptence and tolerance of things which used to be abborrent to us, and which has proven to be so destructive over the past several decades." Who would know? The ones feeling the feelings or the ones observing them? If people are watching football, most of em start screaming at the television, but they forget that it's making the players tired, and afterwards they go to their friends, talk to them about the match, and they say that number 28 sucked. Is that fair? No, because the player was tired, didn't see everything at that moment. Does that make him bad? No. The people at home don't understand. You are that person at home. We are the players. You don't feel that tiredness, that special feeling, WE do. --- "Dazed, I do want to wish you luck in your plans for marriage and all success in it. I hope this will help you overcome those feelings of incompleteness you must have in not being permitted, as one poster lamented in here, the same kind of intimacy and union of relationship everyone else [heterosexuals] enjoys." Thank you. I appreciate that. I think... --- I'm not at all assuming that you'll molest your son should you have one someday. Not at all. I regret to say that I fear your marriage will find itself wanting. I don't think you'll find satisfaction and completeness with your wife, not because of any failure on her part, but because she simply can't replace your deeper longings..and that is for a union of flesh and spirit with a boy. I am only marrying because I love my wife. Then, if I get a son or daughter, I will treat him/her just like my lil' friend, just not the love, but 100% father-feelings. (Which is love in a way too.) - *pants* *sighs* *blows at fingertips to cool them off* Allright... That's about it, I guess... Oh yeah... My name is DAZE, not DAZED. :-) |
Follow ups: