Re: Anyone agree with Triple-Q (from BC)?
Submitted by Ben on April 01 1999 at 07:55:46
In reply to Anyone agree with Triple-Q (from BC)? Submitted by d on March 31 1999 at 12:13:11
|
David - In my particular case the answer is no. I am very unusual as a boylover (and it is totally but dumb luck) that my desire for boys evolved as a voyeuristic ritual rather than a sexual one. Maybe this became so because I was fortunate enough to grow up in a solid home with two parents who loved me and all of the right support of a middle class kid. I couldn't have dreamed of doing sexual things with another boy so I instead would fantasize about cute boys around me. Even today, my fantasies always involve just looking at cute boys and seeing them shirtless, not naked, doing normal boy things such as playing sports or enjoying the beach. I am not proud of the fact that I fantasize about shirtless boys, the same boys many times who I am entrusted to care for, however when I am not involved in fantasy, my love and caring for the boys around me is true and unsexual. I am not into trying to cop a feel, or get a boy to undress in front of me. I truly cherish the boys' minds, their hearts and their smiles. Nothing could be greater than sitting side by side on the couch playing a game or watching a movie. I have been alone with boys so many thousands of times, with each one an opportuntity to molest them and the thought has never crossed my mind. By plain old luck I don't need any help preventing something that is never in tendency to happen. I am here because I have found God through the help of other Christians and I wish to be able to exchange Christian ideas, to give and get support, and to be able to talk about BL issues which I obviously cannot share in my church. God bless. 
Ben |