thank you for being calm this time...
Submitted by scott on May 16 1999 at 17:48:12
In reply to Re: got a question... Submitted by jm on May 16 1999 at 08:43:40
|
it makes it much easier to have an intelligent conversation that way. i do, however, have a couple of questions about your answers. >>Personal: No sodomite/pederast ever commits to lifelong monogomas relationship. How many of us do you know in real life? are you a "sodomite/pederast?" then how can you make a blanket statement. about something which you do not understand? i have a young friend whom i have known for eight years now. we still keep in touch and visit whenever we can, and plan to for as long as we can. how else would you define lifelong? and why do you tell me whether or not i can remain monogamous? have you any control over my actions? why do you have such an emphasis on sodomy? it is only one part of sex. does sex with your wife consist merely of copulation? i highly doubt it, there is probably a lot more involved. what of us who do not engage in anal sex with boys, but other types? what category are we in? Mental: You cannot love a boy in a long term relationship... i already mentioned my young friend, who is not getting any younger...he is on his way to becoming a man, and we are still friends. you also mention many times about us fulfilling our "bodily needs." what if we never do that? what if we go our whole life without touching a boy sexually? what if we are abstinent every day of our lives? paul himself said, it is better to be single... by the logic that we must obey the letter of the bible, that means that i am better than you, for you submitted to your lust and got married... now i know that not to be true, but you seem to be caught up in labeling classes of people as better or worse, so it probably makes sense to you. ...and he said unto them, whatever you do to the least of my children, that you do also unto me... scott |