Dear Pam
Submitted by Triple Q on October 24 1999 at 23:51:23
In reply to Reponse to Mr Bach from another message board! Submitted by Pamella (BlackWolf) on October 24 1999 at 12:19:14
|
I am happy you have a place to go meet with each other but at the same time a person whom is attracted to young boys, as should a drug addict refrain from being around them. To paraphrase you: I am happy you have a place to go meet with each other but at the same time a person who loves to eat, as should a drug addict refrain from being around food. I am happy you have a place to go meet with each other but at the same time a person who smokes, as should a drug addict refrain from being around cigarettes. I am happy you have a place to go meet with each other but at the same time a heterosexual person who enjoys sex, as should a drug addict refrain from having sex. The list could go on, but the intent is clear enough...simply because something could have a detrimental effect on a person does not mean that simply desiring that something is detrimental. Or that a person should refrain from being near that something simply because he desires it. This kind of circular thinking is quite effective for people who can only sit on the sidelines and tell other people how they SHOULD act when it is the other people who are having to deal with the "problems". Quote from you "Rather than reacting to the fear of people we don't understand, it would be far better to take the courage to get to know "the enemy" and live what he is living and through that understanding we can better protect our children. Bach as a "Children Right's Advocate I have taken the time to study the minds of the "Boylovers" pedophiles for years. I will not call them the "the enemy" because I feel no hated towards any one that has a problem or any one period. I will continue to fight the good fight of protecting our children from sexual abuse by a child molested or a pedophile. You or any "Boylovers" have nothing to fear from me or the law unless you are doing something to a child that is against the law. I will continue to fight for children to be safe from fear of getting killed or raped by a child molested by education parents and police department on where the danger are for their children. As a "Boylovers" I would think you group would advocate and vote for the "No second Chance" law to protect the children if you truly love them. Here is the addy if you would care to read about this law. http://www.house.gov/salmon/crime.htm We have children everyday that are missing because of a child molester need to control a other person and the children become their victims. Control is the issues not sex as like the rapist it is the need to control a victim that we are discussing. Personally, I will not now nor will I ever advocate anything that so rigidly denies any human being their most basic rights. The "No Second Chance" law would do this. Would this law apply to runaways? Would they be held in juvie until they were eighteen after they decided to run away overnight to a friend's house because their parents were beating them? How about a thief who steals some food simply because their family is starving to death? Would this law throw him in jail for the rest of his life? Laws that are so absolute and deny any human being their basic rights are not going to be anything more than an easy way for whole segments of society to be bullied and butchered. It's this kind of thinking that leads to people like Hitler. And protecting children is not a role designated solely for Child Advocates or Christians or Government officials. It is not only the duty but it is the responsibility to every man and woman who has any contact with a child. Children are our future. If we choose to ignore them now, what kind of future are we to have? You can continue to "fight the good fight" but, remember this, the only enemy you have is the enemy that you create. On the other side of this coin, "It is not for me to understand your needs but for each of you to understand your selves." I am the only one that can understand me and I would never expect any one else to understand why I do what I do and believe how I believe. We each have a different background that makes up the person we are. For this, I thank our "Lord" in heaven. Yes, sir I am a Christian person whom does fight for our children right is to be fear from harm and I am very proud of this. I would hope as Christians, your group would forget about your own problems and fight for the safety of children. I see that you are judging us despite your objections to the contrary. How do you know that we are not helping children? And, before your warped little pea-brain can protest, I am in no way shape or form referring to sex. My suggestion would be for your group to understand that not everyone hates the "Boylovers" or does not take the time to understand them! This is not a fact and produces too much hate instead of people talking about what the real issue's are. One of them being why do "Boylovers" feels the need for young children instead of a healthy gay relationship with adults (no I am not againist the gay life.) I love to see comments here from any group and would love to see all people talk openly without the "idea of speaking how other think" that is already in your heads. This is not a fight of us against you but a fight to save the children from harm and they must come before any adult feelings or problems. Most of the time the people that are "Boylovers" whom come to our board feel the need to convinces us about there sexual preference for young boys is not wrong. They then get angry and leave when we did not agreed with their point of view. You say that you do not hate us nor do you wish to produce hate, but your own words belie the conviction you fake when you say this stuff. You've already judged us as evil since you take the time to threaten us with the police (above) if we do act upon our desires. You don't have to hate us to do us damage. All you have to do is close your eyes to the words being written...and live up to the rhetoric that's being spouted about us. We're nothing like the A&E programs. We're nothing like the newspaper reports or magazine articles. We're human with very human emotions and desires. You don't see that because you don't want to. ...why do "Boylovers" feels the need for young children instead of a healthy gay relationship with adults (no I am not againist the gay life.) The lesser of two evils, huh? At least, two adults can consent to sex whether it's offensive to you or not. Consider if you will, you have a choice between a steak dinner or a peanut butter sandwich, a glass of sparkling white wine or a glass of water, a cold shower or a steamy sauna, etc. Now, as you were reading these choices, you were subconsciously choosing which one you would like...right? It's much the same with us. You have no idea why you choose one over the other any more than the fact that it appeals to you for some reason. We have no idea why we choose boys over men for any other reason than that boys appeal to us more than men. It's not a conscious decision that we make. It just is. My main concern is education of parents and to stop "Nambla" from passing a law to make underage consensual sex with children legal. If you care about the children and love them as you say, please join this fight to protect our young. If you had been monitoring my posts (doubtful), you would know that I AM opposed to that particular law being instituted. Surprised? Peace be with you, ma'am! TQ, the resident atheist |