If indeed there were as many kids hurt in cars in relation to the number of times they ride in cars as there are kids hurt by sexual interaction with an adult, there would indeed be laws against taking kids for rides till the safety issue could be addressed.

There you go again believing strongly in assumptions for which you have absolutely no evidence. You have no data to back up your assertion, yet it is the basis of all your conclusions.

The fact is that good data on this doesn't exist and the data that does exist is, at best, inconclusive, and at worst, directly contradicts your view. One study found that sexual contact with adults as a child increases the person's likelihood of developing clinically significant problems by a whopping 1%.

So, with the absence of any data to back up your view, why do you insist on assuming some great probability?


That's why there are laws against being sexual with a minor.

No, it isn't. Laws against being sexual with a minor are not based on any sort of research and did not develop as a consequence of harm to minors who were sexually involved with adults. These laws developed as a result of a change in moral values brought about by a confluence of many different factors including: industrialization, puritanism, changes in social structure, and advances in medicine.


Too many times it results in the kids getting hurt.

There you go again with your made up data.


Also, broken bones can heal a lot easier than a broken spirit.

Can a fractured spine heal easier? What about a lifetime strapped to a ventilator? Can massive brain damage? What about death? What about horrible disfigurement? What about third degree burns throughout most of your body?

Those are the kinds of things you risk by just getting into a car.

I think you said in a post a long time ago that you knew a guy who had a loving sexual relationship with his YF and that it didn't seem harmful. That may be why you are more accepting of it. I, however, have seen the opposite, which is why I tend to get a bit passionate about it.

I've known quite a few, not just one.

I'll let the insults towards the end of your post slide.

I apologize if you felt insulted by anything I said. I did not intend for it to sound that way.

Your assumptions about how a pro-sex BL (for lack of a better term) would respond to your challenges showed that you don't really have a firm grasp on the dynamics of those relationships or how such a person would respond. This is not a bad thing at all, it just means that you have had far less contact with such people than I have and, understandably, don't have a good grasp on their mentality and way of life. I don't see that as an insult at all; in fact, for many here, I am sure that's actually a positive thing.