The problem with that attitude is that you have to define what are the 'laws of nature'. Specifically do they legitimate rape and murder since those behaviours are seen in nature? If so I look forward to someone helping you understand why that's not a good idea - hopefully without leaving you too damaged.

Actually such an approach has interesting consequences in the field of paedophilia. It's a well established fact that women - or rather girls - who have a child too early are likely to seriously damage their birth canal. Similarly anal sex is likely to do damage to boys. So does the fact that both are desire by SOME paedophiles prove that their desire are contrary to nature?