Well?
Submitted by mvanhouten on December 08 2000 21:34:48
In reply to You're right submitted by Triple Q on December 08 2000 10:19:20
|
Can you picture a few media sources like the large newspaper chains producing front line stories on Presbyophilia? Some accurate, some puffed up beyond any sense of reality. Over a six month period puffing up stories of rapes of old people, of sex in nursing homes? Writing editorials demanding new laws to protect our seniors? How outraged citizens demand more money for police task forces to stop this filthy crime against our most vunerable citizens. Then expand this to erotic images (mostly old nudest magazine ripoffs) of old folks NAKED. Could you see that, within a year these media people could create a new sexual minority-- the presbyophile. Vunerable and rejected, they would meet anonymously on the internet to complain about the injustce done to them. And then Heather would come along and start talking about presbyophiles. All the time. Talking and writing and setting up debate sites and sticking her nose into their small tentative defensive communities. The journalist creating her own stories. Always assuring them she supports them, but never saying she supports seniors having sex with non-seniors, and avoiding the question when asked. She loves the sinner but really really dislikes the sin. But what these poor presbyophiles really COULD use is NOT endless debates and news stories and busybody hobby-journalist constantly talking about presybophilia, presybophilia, presybophilia. They need people like that to SHUT UP. They need start getting the debate off this artificial label and on to ideas of fundamental rights for all people. |
Follow ups: