Re: Then you aren't a BL ? Maybe not.
Submitted by Mavrick on 2002-10-16 19:40:32, Wednesday
In reply to Then you aren't a BL... submitted by zip on 2002-10-16 18:36:45, Wednesday
|
Zip, I understand what you are saying and perhaps you are right, by the "Standard definition of what a BL is. That is why I said that in my opinion, and bymy definition, I am. I had an online chat whith Oliver last night. He pointed something out that I had not considered before. He said that by the definition that I gave regarding the relationships I have with boys, that I was more of a Mentor. I guess I can agree with that. But to me it denies the loves the aspect of the relationship I have. Again, as you pointed out, not a sexual attraction. It's more of a father and son relationship. But in my mind I will always refer to myself as a boy lover, by my definition. By the way, I like the "Standard disclaimer" on your post. That is a great way to phrase it. Mav. |
Follow ups: