Andy, I've taken time to read some of the CBF posts. The thread on Michael Jackson displayed a mixture of embarassment and forlorn hopes that pedophiles may have found an ideal or model "Boylover" in Jackson--if only he weren't so bizarre, hadn't had all that bad publicity over molesting a young boy nor dangled a baby with one arm from over several stories high. You'd think this would at least give you pedophiles a clue as to the emotional immaturity and normlessness symptomatic of this kind of sexual disorder. I don't intend to make any further posts [hears unified sigh of relief], as, frankly, pedophiles tend to give me the creeps. I happened on a link to this site from a discussion board on ancient Greece and Rome, Greek and Roman law and marriages, some discussion on pedophilia, and relevent material from Philia magazine posted with a url link. When I saw the link to "Christian Boylovers" I was struck by what seems to me an oxymoron--knowing that "Boylove" is the buzzword of homosexual pedophiles such as NAMBLA. As I live in New England, the horrible murder and rape of 10 year old Jeffrey Curley by NAMBLA members still strikes a raw nerve in me. In anger I posted here and without any regrets or apologies I stick by my post. You asked me if I've read any of the posts in here, and now I'll ask you if you read mine in totality and context? I think you need to read it again carefully, so that you'll know what I am and what I am not. --Ron |