I dont think you read anything
Submitted by Drifter on 2003-02-15 01:21:29, Saturday
In reply to Re: Just Wondering... submitted by Ron on 2003-02-15 01:03:24, Saturday
|
Or else you would have noticed this (taken directly from the post in question with parts highlited in bold): If we consider his bl side as if it were in a bubble separate from the rest of his life, then perhaps I could agree with that. Assuming, of course, that the abuse allegations against him were false. However, we must judge his life as a whole and in so doing we find out that Michael Jackson is too strange to be the best example of anything. Had you somehow had the misfortune to miss reading it as the second sentence of the first answer, you got a second chance in the very first sentence of the second answer, again included here: Same answer as above. Taken separately from the rest of his life, and assuming the abuse allegations are false, then he is a perfect example of what a boylover should be. The amount of time and money he has spent on helping children through programs like his make a wish foundation is incompareable. Furthermore, his personal work one on one with needy or sick children is to be applauded. However, again...there hangs the specter of his oddities (masks, gloves, skin tone changes, plastic surgery, multiple marriages, hanging babies from balconies, etc.) Apparently you read only the parts you wanted to read and skipped some sentences you didnt like. Why do I assume Michael Jackson is innocent? because I always like to assume someone is innocent until proven guilty, and in this case there is as much evidence that this was a case of extortion as there is that this was a case of child abuse. e-mail: webnomad@ziplip.com url: http://www.fpc.net/sites/drifter/ |
Follow ups: