Re: Err...
Submitted by JohnDoe420 on 2003-03-28 03:57:10, Friday
In reply to Dear JD submitted by Dakota on 2003-03-27 02:52:50, Thursday
|
BTW. I understand why you didn't want to post this at OH. But you could have e-mailed me. :-) Err... sorry 'bout that... ::hangs head in shame:: But keep in mind that I'm not going to just delete anything you say to delete. Never expected ya to. ;) links would be helpful in pinpointing anyplace libel has occurred. ... But if it really libelous, such as stating as fact that you are engaged in some kind of illegal activity... That's precisely what I'm looking at - like I said prior, offensive debate tactics I can deal with on my own, where they aren't illegal. I know it's helpful to whether you can justify your actions to yourself... http://www.openhands.net/main/messages/117743.htm ...slightly more debatably, as it doesn't specify *which* poster (me or lutki) he's accusing of child molestation... and also doesn't fully assert (unlike the last post) that sexuality is the means of harm implied... As for the children they will harm. ... We can only offer them a hand on the day they hit bottom and are willing to change their harmful ways. http://www.openhands.net/main/messages/117608.htm ...this one's also not absolute in its explicit equivocation of 'dissenting belief=active child molestation,' but could near-certainly pass in a court of law... or at least get a court-order for a disclaimer added... If you truly believe that your ways are right, then all I can do is hope someone puts a bullet to you before you find another kid... http://www.openhands.net/main/messages/117758.htm Ah! Here's one of the most grotesque ones (I believe you also have read enough to know better on all three counts he offers)... John Doe referred to sexual contact with a preteen that supposedly the preteens mother begged him to do. http://www.openhands.net/main/messages/117760.htm Oh... here's an even more repeatedly-criminal one... You are really good at finding justifications for how you behave. ... you aren't about to even consider the harmfulness of your behavior. http://www.openhands.net/main/messages/117576.htm This is by no means a complete list, but represents instead a cursory reading... if you would like me to fully review AnonymousMan's posts, I can do so in the morrow... ...but I *do* believe that this is enough to qualify for 'deeply and criminally libelous and/or slanderous'... ...and again, he can lie about me and/or my assertions all he wishes, as far as I am concerned - except where such ventures into the criminal and fallacious allegation of criminal behavior. The latter is enough to jepordize the board and its posters, erroneously. |
Follow ups: