These are just our opinions here. And there are circumstances that would prove each of ours right. But let me read back to you what you wrote... "When the needs are similar in magnitude, and even in many cases when they are not, non-bl adults favor taking care of the child's need before that of an adult." and also you quoted me and responded... "> time would sooner be spent tending to any need no matter how small of a boy then it would be tending to say...an old mans need, no matter how great.< probably does not apply to all boylovers, and certaintly not all people. Do you see where the contridiction is? I don't mean to pick your post apart but its an indication to me that we arent quite in tune with one another. You stated that you were not a boy lover so Im really not sure I could ever make you fully understand what it feels like. In an ideal world age, my opinion, wouldnt matter. Only the level of need. Its true that our government favors helping kids over adults but my original point was this and Im sorry for being blunt with the wording... who you would like to hop into bed with usually dictates who you are going to show more compassion towards. Thats the way I see it. Certainly not always but very nearly. If your talking about two stangers that you dont have a sexual attraction towards and one is a child, most definatly, the child usually gets helped first. But I have to say, as much as I hate to see a child hurt that I disagree with you that its more important for us as a society to as a rule extend ourselves toward children first so that they wont end up a "crook or lazy bum" over extending help to an adult who needs it. I guess I once was a crook and a lazy bum but it didnt come from time that wasnt spent on me as a child but from opprotunity that wasnt given to me when I reached adulthood. But even knowing that it wouldnt be enough for me not to help a child first. But, then again, Im a boy lover. BLues |