I strongly disagree...
Submitted by J on 2003-02-23 18:58:09, Sunday
In reply to Re: For Ron, About NAMBLA and WWJD submitted by Chris on 2003-02-23 16:00:18, Sunday
|
...is it [NAMBLA] perhaps being against rape and murder up front while you try to change the age of consent laws so that sex with children will be ok. I'm sorry, but if you promote a change like that, you are promoting sex with children. Here (because of your own beliefs) you are equating rape of children and sex with children - they are not the same. An argument one usually hears from non-BL's, but from another BL? Believing sex with children is morally wrong (which the majority of posters here believe) is one thing, but to equate it with rape is quite another... I am sincerely against adults having a sexual relationship with children, regardless of how it is presented. And you are certainly entitled to your opinion even though I sincerely disagree with you. ...when a supressed group of people feel they have been dished out yet another wrong by an "uncarring" society, that group of people will begin to feel that they can justify actions which are seen as illegal and condemned by the moral standards of that society. They will begin to justify actions as horrible as rape and murder. Rubbish - but I love you anyway, brother! I could and would never justify such horrible actions against a group of people (boys) that I sincerely love and care about. And I have been dished out many wrongs by society relating to being a BL (remember I spent time in prison). Would you similarly argue that the Christians who were about to be fed to lions in Rome were out raping and murdering by night? I sincerely doubt it... In Christ, J Come away, O human child, to the waters of the wild, with a fairy hand in hand, for the world’s more full of weeping than you can understand. |
Follow ups: