Greetings brothers, from the depths.

I was chatting to a friend of mine yesterday who proposed to me a most perplexing idea based on the premise that boys are sexual creatures.

The suggestion was that since we hunger for boys and since they are sexual then if we spend time with them some connection between those two realities will inevitably occur.

The suggestion went so far as to claim that the only way of avoiding this inevitability was to avoid boys altogether.

Frightening.

And Yet.

More frightening is the way this idea seems to fit with my own experience. I've met the flirty boy. He's not every boy but he's common enough. And when he knows you're interested in him, and somehow he magically knows, it's like he wants you to have him; he invites you in, compells you to taste him.
I've also met, more commonly, the compliant boy. He who's only desire is to please you. Who's willingness to work towards my happiness would even lay him on the alter of my hungers were I to allow such a thing - GOD FORBID!

My friend suggested that it is merely a question of degrees how we respond when we find ourselves in such inevitable situations. We may choose never to take these moments beyond the briefest flirt or "innocent" brush against the clothing (and there are some who'd call us monsters just for that). Some, perhaps with a less godly agenda, may take it all and drink deeply of it, and some may even call it love - who is to know, such things are beyond my humble grasp.

But there it is. The onrush of inevitability. Are we truely bound to collide with it. And if this is so, does righteous demand that we should deny ourselves ANY contact with those we hunger for that we may avoid it?

Alas, such a choice is for stronger men than I.

All my love.
Darkness
XXXOOOXXX