Not logical
Submitted by A.I. Watcher on May 26 2002 15:16:48
In reply to too bad submitted by Dakota on May 26 2002 15:05:33
|
To allow some suffering here on Earth so we can have an eternity of fellowship with an all loving God seems like a pretty darn good deal to me. It was my understanding that the however many millions of people it was whom your god killed by drowning in the flood were sinners and doomed to an eternity of unspeakable horror and torture in hell. Is this not your understanding too? So where's the good deal? The child doesn't understand that the shot is so he won't get sick. He is just concerned with the temporary pain. But is the pain not permanent? Again, I understood that billions of people are and will be burning in the flames of hell being tortured for eternity by your god. In what way is the pain temporary? Do you subscribe to a different set of beliefs than most Christians? I am confident they were and are neccesary in order for an ultimately holy God to have fellowship with a very unholy people. But your god is supposed to have defined what is holy and what isn't. He stacked the deck against most people in the world who ever were or who ever will be. That was his choice after all as Christians claim there is no limit to his power. I believe omnipotence is an important doctrinal issue. So why would a loving, omnipotent god stack the system in such a way that most of the people he created would suffer never-ending flames of agony and torment. Sorry but that's the opposite of love. And fuck you again you supreme and vile asshole for your crack about my life of hate. I can tell you my life is FULL of love. There's certainly no room in it for the vile and unspeakable horrors you claim your god is all about. |
Follow ups: