Just wrong.
Submitted by mvanhouten on December 06 2000 23:55:01
In reply to Interesting Enough Points But... submitted by Triple Q on December 06 2000 23:37:41
|
"No matter what terms we use, the person is not the creation of the label, the label is reflective of the person." That is just wrong. You brought that up before. If you want to learn something, read some of the texts I pointed out before. Look at the terms: Black, negro, african, etc. Each term is flawed. It doesn't define a type of person that can be measured by a scientist. It seperates one person from another ARTIFICIALLY. There is a racial gradiation from Lappland to the Congo. There is NO dividing line between black and white. Go to Sicily, go to Egypt. There those terms become useless. "Negro" was defined by slave traders to artifically divide people, so to justify their filthy business. They had to go to central africa to get their victims, northern africa was much closer, but the people there just weren't 'negro' enough to fit their lies about the superiority of the white race. There is no gene a scientist can pick out, not mental or physical test to divide blacks from whites in the world. (So to justify their lies the whitest whites went looking for the blackest blacks.) There are no "black" or "white" genes, but a spectrum of genes that one can find anywhere in the human population to a greater or lesser extent. There are not "pedophile" genes either. We have that label because we are artificially divided into that class of people. We have desires that one can find anywhere in the human population to a greater or lesser extent. The Greeks had no need to divide people into gay/straight/pedophile. Anyone in ancient greece could be anyone of those at any time. They recognized the behavior, but did not divide their population into those categories. Many other cultures avoided doing this also. PEDOPHILE IS A CONSTRUCTED LABEL OF THIS TIME AND CULTURE. |
Follow ups: