mysterious sexuality = homosexuality?
Submitted by Splash! on 2002-07-6 01:40:48, Saturday
In reply to Re: without sin submitted by turner on 2002-07-5 02:29:35, Friday
|
How can established religion dare denounce homosexuality when the founder of its faith was himself a man of mysterious, unknown sexuality who could, for all we know, have been homosexual? The Bible tells us that Jesus was born a man and therefore presumably had male sexual feelings. It would have been more or less impossible, iologically, for him not to have an element of erotic arousal - even if nly having the normal male response of waking with an erection. And I said: "How can one be a homosexual if one has the thoughts but does not entertain them? Same with being a pedophile and even a heterosexual. As soon as the thought came, he brought it into obedience to God. Jesus had to be a pure, holy sacrifice. I don't believe he ever entertained lustful thoughts, and certainly didn't act on them..." That's most likely why his sexuality was mysterious -- he didn't act on it. It's ludicrous to call him a homsexual because he had a mysterious sexuality. |
Follow ups: