I need cat dady's god in order to have rights?

Christian Boylove Forum

I need cat dady's god in order to have rights?

Submitted by A.I. Watcher on September 2 2001 08:37:04

Cat daddy says:

Our government is an artificial entity created by man. All they can do is guarantee the God given rights we already enjoy. Those rights existed before there was a Constitution or our government. The only thing our government can grant is license or privelege. And priveleges can be taken away at the government's whim. They can't do that with rights. Rights are given to us by God. And God never sanctioned the "rights" for which the gay movement is lobbying.

First off, I don't believe in your god. He's not real. If he were, I'd be on the other side because the way your religion describes him makes him unlike anyone or anything I'd want to be around. I don't enjoy hanging around twisted, arrogant sadists.

Second, your god CERTAINLY didn't grant me any rights. As a human being, I have the same rights that anyone else has. I have the right to live and make love with whom I choose free from persecuction. I don't need your superstitions to GIVE me those rights.

The gay rights movement lobbies for things like the right for queers to have jobs, acquire housing and obtain health care on an equal basis with everyone else. Anyone who would try to deny us those things must be an evil person. THe things we want can't hurt you. To try to deny us based on your religious beliefs.

Take your superstions, fold them til they're all sharp corners and shove em where the sun doesn't shine.

The very idea that your god is needed to grant me rights is INSANE. What arrogant religious ideas you have.,

Follow ups:

Still being evasive, huh, Watcher? - Cat Daddy September 3 2001 03:42:00 (19)
- I've answered certain questions - A.I. Watcher September 3 2001 09:34:25 (18)
  - You are becoming tiring - Cat Daddy September 4 2001 01:30:58 (3)
    - I'm not the one.... - A.I. Watcher September 4 2001 08:57:49 (2)
      - I'm not either . . . - Cat Daddy September 5 2001 03:03:31 (1)
        
        I'm supremely uninterested in the question - A.I. Watcher September 5 2001 09:21:35 (0)
  - if you don't like religious zealots - Bach September 3 2001 10:39:48 (13)
    - I don't think everyone here is a zealot - A.I. Watcher September 3 2001 10:50:51 (12)
      - Re: I don't think everyone here is a zealot - asb September 3 2001 19:47:46 (11)
        
        Thanks - A.I. Watcher September 4 2001 09:04:40 (10)
        
        Re: Its ironic - John Doe September 5 2001 10:36:30 (9)
        
        BTW, long as you're still here. Another question. - A.I. Watcher September 9 2001 21:18:50 (3)
        
        Re: BTW, long as you're still here. Another question. - John Doe September 10 2001 10:46:14 (2)
        
        Can we PLEASE stick to the point? - A.I. Watcher September 10 2001 16:54:08 (1)
        
        Re: Can we PLEASE stick to the point? - John Doe September 13 2001 11:42:17 (0)
        
        Something I still don't understand - A.I. Watcher September 7 2001 13:29:03 (4)
        
        Re: Something I still don't understand - John Doe September 9 2001 18:45:22 (3)
        
        I'm talking about civil rights - A.I. Watcher September 9 2001 20:18:05 (2)
        
        Re: I'm talking about civil rights - John Doe September 10 2001 10:26:15 (1)
        
        Not at all - A.I. Watcher September 10 2001 17:07:06 (0)
Rights, privilages, etc. - d September 3 2001 00:47:13 (23)
- The Proof that God Exists Within Us.. Potentially. - Solid~Air September 3 2001 22:07:03 (1)
  - Um, friendly rebuttal - d September 5 2001 15:41:13 (0)
- Precisely - A.I. Watcher September 3 2001 11:48:44 (20)
  - You misread me, but in practican terms, we agree - d September 3 2001 20:51:43 (19)
    - But it's the Christians doing it - A.I. Watcher September 4 2001 09:02:46 (5)
      - The squeaky voter gets Congressional support? - d September 5 2001 15:45:12 (4)
        
        Brings me back to my original point. - A.I. Watcher September 6 2001 09:49:12 (3)
        
        Well, starting in the late '70s - d September 7 2001 01:40:15 (2)
        
        It started centuries before the 1970s - A.I. Watcher September 7 2001 08:51:28 (1)
        
        '70s were SBC-specific - d September 7 2001 16:23:37 (0)
    - Good Luck - Cat Daddy September 4 2001 02:10:46 (12)
      - We are all the richer (nt) - d September 5 2001 15:46:54 (0)
      - You thoroughly misunderstand the issue - A.I. Watcher September 4 2001 12:07:07 (10)
        
        One of us certainly does - Cat Daddy September 5 2001 03:42:40 (0)
        
        i dunno - Bach September 4 2001 12:12:17 (8)
        
        Here's another quote for you - A.I. Watcher September 4 2001 12:32:10 (4)
        
        You know what happens when you assume . . . - Cat Daddy September 5 2001 04:30:48 (2)
        
        So, do you believe... - A.I. Watcher September 5 2001 08:52:19 (1)
        
        This was an important question. Why evasive? - A.I. Watcher September 6 2001 09:45:40 (0)
        
        This one is closer - Bach September 4 2001 13:13:05 (0)
        
        I think you are mistaken - A.I. Watcher September 4 2001 12:29:01 (2)
        
        I think Watcher is mistaken - Cat Daddy September 5 2001 05:44:03 (0)
        
        That's one way to read it - Bach September 4 2001 13:06:07 (0)
Insane? - Forgiven September 2 2001 18:40:06 (3)
- Re: Insane? Good word. - Rue-D September 4 2001 11:19:54 (0)
- Sins & Errors = Men Laying With Men - Solid~Air September 3 2001 22:46:39 (0)
- First of all .... - A.I. Watcher September 2 2001 19:23:17 (0)

Post a follow up message:

Username:		Password:
Email (optional):
Subject:

Link URL:
Link Title: